Letters

to the editor

Following the Big Issue feature on electric cars published in the Spring ​edition of Rotary Magazine, we have received a number of letters on the ​subject. Here is a selection of those letters. After this issue, the subject has ​been closed.

What’s not to like ​about electric cars?

Just to put the other side of the debate ​- I have owned an electric car for over ​four years, it has covered 32,000 miles ​and I have never experienced range ​anxiety.


It will cover 270 miles on a full charge, ​but I prefer to regard the practical ​maximum as 200. I have off-street ​parking and mostly charge from my ​domestic supply which attracts 5% VAT ​compared with 20% at all public ​charging points.


Good planning is necessary when ​undertaking long journeys but most of ​my motoring involves journeys of 20 ​miles or less daily.


Planning is relatively easy using web ​sites such as ZapMap, but it is always ​advisable to have an alternative plan. ​Many hotels and even B&Bs now have ​charging points as do some National ​Trust attractions.


Fuel costs work out at less than 50% of ​those for internal combustion engine ​cars. Servicing costs are low due to the ​fewer number of moving parts and ​brake pads and discs look as if they ​will last 100,000 miles because the ​regenerative braking provided by the ​electric motor which acts as a ​generator helping to slow the car ​thereby assisting the brakes.


Oh, and the acceleration is addictive! ​What’s not to like?


John Griffiths,

Rotary Club of Hythe, Kent

Electric vehicle ​article overcharged

The article in the Spring 2024 Rotary ​Magazine about electric vehicles ​appears slightly ‘overcharged’!


Volvo estimates that an electric Volvo ​C40 needs to be driven around 68,400 ​miles to have a lower total ​carbon footprint than its petrol ​equivalent, if the former is powered by ​the current global electricity mix. ​Based on 2021 UK driving statistics, t​he average annual mileage is 7,400 m​iles.


A​utomakers from Ford Motor and G​eneral Motors to Mercedes-Benz, V​olkswagen, Jaguar Land Rover and A​ston Martin are scaling back or d​elaying their electric vehicle plans.


A​lso, Tesla has reportedly cut down its e​lectric vehicle production at its Giga S​hanghai factory in China due to s​luggish growth in the sales of new-e​nergy vehicles, tough competition a​nd price war, according to B​loomberg.


S​ir Jim Ratcliffe, founder of the INEOS G​roup, stated: “There is a rather f​undamental drawback with the e​lectric car. It simply doesn’t do what y​ou want a car to do. It doesn’t get you f​rom A to B reliably if you are on a l​ong journey. And you have no idea w​hether you will be able to fill it up. P​ut it together and it’s referred to as ‘​range anxiety’. And it’s very real.”


I​ do agree with ‘diversity’ in all areas of l​ife, but let’s get back to reality, which p​olicy makers frequently overlook.


J​ohn Morton,

N​ewport Rotary Club, Staffordshire

Is there a future for ​electric cars?

In his article in the Spring issue of ​Rotary Magazine, Norman Hunter ​presented a very compelling case for ​the future of electric cars (EVs). But ​this is hardly surprising given his role ​with The Electric Vehicle Association ​Scotland.


The reality is that not all ​manufacturers are "ratcheting up ​production" as he says and some, ​notably Tesla, are actually reducing EV ​production, reacting to decreasing not ​increasing demand. And one of the ​largest car rental companies in the ​world (whom I had better not name) is ​disposing of their EV fleet in response ​to renters insisting on petrol or diesel ​internal combustion engine cars (ICEs).


An EV has a much shorter range than ​an ICE and ready availability of ​charging points is spasmodic. Both are ​typically advertised in the most ​optimistic terms by manufacturers in ​their advertising. But ranges quoted ​are achieved under strict test ​conditions and can be dramatically ​reduced by the use of headlights, ​wipers, climate controls and audio ​systems.


Then there are the real environmental ​impacts of EVs. Manufacturing of an ​EV actually produces a greater carbon ​footprint than an ICE. The lithium ​batteries powering EVs make them ​much heavier than ICEs and the tyres ​and brakes of EVs wear faster, all of ​which have environmental impact.


And what about the mining of lithium ​for the batteries? This is extracted ​from some of the poorest countries in ​the world who do not enjoy the ​standards of safety, health and ​welfare we take for granted for our ​people.


EVs have been around just long ​enough for them starting to be ​scrapped and their parts and ​components recycled. For lithium ​batteries that is an issue still to be ​resolved.


Hugh McCrea,

Rotary Club of Bridge of Allan & ​Dunblane, Scotland

Next Arrow Button
Home
Next Arrow Button

FOLLOW US

Simple Facebook Icon
round icon
round icon
In Typography Outline
Simple Instagram Icon
Simple Youtube Icon

© 2024 Rotary International in Great Britain & Ireland